Van's Air Force

The definitive Van's Aircraft support community! Buying, building or flying an RV? Join our exclusive family of mentors and enthusiasts!

Estate Planniing Question

BlackhawkSP

Well Known Member
I had a question for the lawyer, pilot types here. I'm having a trust set up for my children, so it's easier on them sorting things out, after I assume room temperature. Can I list my RV-10 and put it in the trust along with the catchall property, etc., or is there some other better way?
 
The advice given to me now over a decade ago, was to make all aviation items or anything "high risk" into its own trust. The trustees, the rules everything can be a copy. The reason given for this, was to help contain possible liability exposure from the rest of the estate. Does not always work, but does often help.

Tim
 
My own such trust just lumps my airplane in with all personal assets. The problem is that ownership of an airplane is all mixed in with a bunch of FAA paperwork and is likely to be a hassle if I still own it when I croak. I have my attorney looking into a way to transfer ownership to my trust now. The problem is that such an ownership transfer in this state may incur a sales/use tax liability. We're trying to figure that out. She doesn't think it's an issue, I'm not so sure.

State laws regarding such estate trusts vary widely. Likely, any advice you receive from SGOTI risks irrelevance. You need to ask this question of your attorney. Internet advice on legal issues is usually worth what you pay for it.
 
I'm not an attorney but interested in the discussion for personal reasons.

How about leaving it out of the trust and adding a beneficiary in your will? That way one person owns it and can choose to transfer or sell with fewer legal issues.

The other option is how about transferring or gifting it before passing.
 
I am an attorney however I do not do any estate planning, so am not in a position to answer your question even if I were inclined to do so. I will say that seeking advice here could be especially perilous, there are advantages and disadvantages to every choice regarding estate planning with a multitude of factors that are different in every situation. There is nothing so different or special about an airplane that any competent estate planning lawyer cannot address. Not to be mean or flippant, but asking for estate planning advice here is a little like asking the estate planning lawyer for advice on riveting.
 
I'm not an attorney but interested in the discussion for personal reasons.

How about leaving it out of the trust and adding a beneficiary in your will? That way one person owns it and can choose to transfer or sell with fewer legal issues.

The other option is how about transferring or gifting it before passing.
If you have a will. You have said what you’d like. Then your estate will go through probate and the state will have a judge and lawyers tying things up in court for them to decide.

One of the bigger bonus points for a trust is to avoid all that.

As said. Get an attorney that specializes in trusts and pay them for their best advice for you.
 
Last year, when we created our trusts and estate plans, I transferred the RV into the trust along with pretty much everything else that is real property (house, collector car, etc.). It took a couple of tries with the FAA, but once I got fed up and handed it over to the attorney's office, his paralegal was able to get someone on the phone at FAA who understood what we were doing and took care of it in about 15 minutes. So that's done.

Putting the plane into a trust will likely do absolutely nothing to shield you from liability, though. That's not what trusts are for...they're for *estate* planning, avoiding probate, etc.
 
My advise- Get a good estate lawyer in the state you reside to answer this. We had our trust set up about 12 years ago in Arizona for the kids/probate avoidance etc. At that time in AZ they recommended that all assets including vehicles be titled to the trust.

Our kids are now grown plus a bunch of other life changes, so we went to the lawyer in KS last year to get it restated. His advice was to not put the plane in the trust. Instead, he recommended it be titled to an LLC which has me as sole member, so thats what we did.

I realize that doesn't entirely shield me from liability, but it's an additional layer that has to be peeled back. It also prevents my personal info from showing up on flight aware or in the aircraft registry. Plus if I ever sell the plane I can just sell the LLC and the plane goes with it pretty seamlessly. I set it up before applying for the AW so the builder is listed as the LLC on the AW and data plate as well.
 
The advice given to me now over a decade ago, was to make all aviation items or anything "high risk" into its own trust. The trustees, the rules everything can be a copy. The reason given for this, was to help contain possible liability exposure from the rest of the estate. Does not always work, but does often help.

Tim
If your the pilot, that does little to no good for liability protection
 
My advise- Get a good estate lawyer in the state you reside to answer this. We had our trust set up about 12 years ago in Arizona for the kids/probate avoidance etc. At that time in AZ they recommended that all assets including vehicles be titled to the trust.

Our kids are now grown plus a bunch of other life changes, so we went to the lawyer in KS last year to get it restated. His advice was to not put the plane in the trust. Instead, he recommended it be titled to an LLC which has me as sole member, so thats what we did.

I realize that doesn't entirely shield me from liability, but it's an additional layer that has to be peeled back. It also prevents my personal info from showing up on flight aware or in the aircraft registry. Plus if I ever sell the plane I can just sell the LLC and the plane goes with it pretty seamlessly. I set it up before applying for the AW so the builder is listed as the LLC on the AW and data plate as well.
Terry, just a curiosity, but given that the “builder” of your airplane is your LLC, who did the FAA issue the Repairman’s Certificate to…the LLC or you? I had previously thought the FAA required builders to be individuals and not corporate entities. Best, Mike
 
Terry, just a curiosity, but given that the “builder” of your airplane is your LLC, who did the FAA issue the Repairman’s Certificate to…the LLC or you? I had previously thought the FAA required builders to be individuals and not corporate entities. Best, Mike
I realize I said builder in my previous post, but I think the actual verbiage is "manufacturer" which isn't really the same thing.

Anyway, It's in my name. It really couldn't work any other way because they're tied to a specific individual and not transferable, unlike the ownership of the airplane.

If I get hit by a bus tomorrow, my wife could sell my LLC and the new owner wouldn't need to do anything at all with the registration other than change the address. My repairman certificate would go into the void along with my pilot, instructor and A&P certificates.
 
Last edited:
I'm not an attorney but interested in the discussion for personal reasons.

How about leaving it out of the trust and adding a beneficiary in your will? That way one person owns it and can choose to transfer or sell with fewer legal issues.

The other option is how about transferring or gifting it before passing.

If you have one pilot beneficiary in your will who will receive the aircraft, what if you sold it to them for $1 now and took care of the registration transfer with an agreement that you will have sole use until you stop flying?
 
If you have one pilot beneficiary in your will who will receive the aircraft, what if you sold it to them for $1 now and took care of the registration transfer with an agreement that you will have sole use until you stop flying?
I would hazard a guess that this will trigger an assessment and a tax impact, unlike transferring it from yourself to yourself as a trustee (which at least here in California, does not).

Then there's insurance...seems like more trouble than it'd worth.
 
If you have one pilot beneficiary in your will who will receive the aircraft, what if you sold it to them for $1 now and took care of the registration transfer with an agreement that you will have sole use until you stop flying?
That makes sense to me.
 
I would hazard a guess that this will trigger an assessment and a tax impact, unlike transferring it from yourself to yourself as a trustee (which at least here in California, does not).

Then there's insurance...seems like more trouble than it'd worth.
The tax implications would be dependent on the state you live in. In KS for example, there's no property tax on experimental or antique airplanes but you do have to proactively fill out the exemption application. Nor is there an inheritance tax. God bless the heartland.

However, if you sell the plane to somebody for a dollar while you're still kicking as in the comment a couple of posts up, they would be on the hook for a 6.5% sales tax. I doubt if they could convince the tax man that it was only worth a dollar when it comes to that bill.

Under this set of conditions, it's better to have it in a trust with them as a contingent trustee, or some equivalent inheritance mechanism.

This is all fun to talk about, but as I said before, a guy really needs to consult a pro in the state where you live to figure out the best way to structure this kind of thing for your specific situation.
 
If you have one pilot beneficiary in your will who will receive the aircraft, what if you sold it to them for $1 now and took care of the registration transfer with an agreement that you will have sole use until you stop flying?
Internet legal advice is THE BEST. [<— sarcasm]
 
This is not about the estate planning part of your question. Our experience was much like RV7Flyer's. The simple part is the aircraft title, which you can convey to the trust just as you would to anyone else (that's what I did). You'll want your estate lawyer to give you the exact verbiage of the name of the "new owner". Also, s/he (and their aides) may take care of all the paperwork for you as part of setting up your estate. We didn't incur any sales tax since there's no sale involved -- but, as they always say, YMMV and check with your lawyer.
 
Internet legal advice is THE BEST. [<— sarcasm]
Absolutely agree, especially the sarcasm. The internet medical advice I've seen is at best laughable and at worst tragic. The problem is that your (my) average run of estate planning attorneys know ZIP about the mysterious ways of the FAA and their registration process. My estate attorney had no problems advising me what to do with boats, motorcycles, and cars but she was clueless about airplanes. I like her a lot and she's (mostly) really sharp, but airplanes is one subject where she was not helpful.

No doubt you've seen this, or at least understand the sentiment.....

Screenshot 2024-10-29 at 7.59.13 PM.png
 
Last edited:
If you have one pilot beneficiary in your will who will receive the aircraft, what if you sold it to them for $1 now and took care of the registration transfer with an agreement that you will have sole use until you stop flying?
It is interesting that you say this as I just had a meeting with my estate planner/lawyer. I also talked to the nice folks at the FAA in OKC.

To make a rather long story short, putting the aircraft in a trust with multiple trustees should allow the FAA to transfer the registration on the aircraft after the passing of the named trustee. I say should because they stated it can be different based on the state of residence. No tax consequence.

Another way is to designate another person as a beneficiary in your will, leaving the aircraft to them. After passing, the beneficiary takes the death certificate to the county court and asks for a letter of testamentary. When granted, the will and letter of testamentary is provided to the FAA who will then register the aircraft in the beneficiaries name. (at least in Indiana) No tax consequence.

Yet another option is to transfer the registration, by sale, to another person prior to death. This is considered a normal sale with the FAA and the will register the aircraft in the new owners name. This may have serious tax implications, as putting $1 sales price on it would likely raise some flags.

The whole thing would be much easier if the aircraft actually had a Title or Property Deed like a car or house. It would then be easy.
 
If you have one pilot beneficiary in your will who will receive the aircraft, what if you sold it to them for $1 now and took care of the registration transfer with an agreement that you will have sole use until you stop flying?
If I buy your aircraft for a dollar. Do I have to pay taxes on it?
If you crash it, am I going to get sued by the family minding their own business on the ground when the plane hit them?
What happens if it wasn’t insured when this accident happened.

I’m sure there are a few other what if’s that would make this a less than optimal situation. But bonus points for thinking outside the box.
 
In Georgia I have the privilege of paying taxes on it every year, just because I own it

Hard to figure. We don’t pay property tax on vehicles, but this year I paid over $700 to “register” my car for the year, while the annual state registration for my airplane was $100.
 
Last edited:
Hard to figure. We don’t pay property tax on vehicles, but this year I paid over $700 to “register” my car for the year, while the annual state registration for my airplane was $100.
In most states, AFAIK, property taxes are *local* (in CA, they are county taxes) while auto (and in some states, aircraft) registration fees are state fees, so two different things.
 
This may have serious tax implications, as putting $1 sales price on it would likely raise some flags.
Indeed.

The UROILA (Universal Rule on Internet Legal Advice):

When someone comes up with an “easy” way to avoid liability or taxes, they will discover that the people writing the laws were smart enough to have ruled out that idea long, long ago.

There are exceptions to the UROILA, but not many—and certainly not for long. 🤣
 
In most states, AFAIK, property taxes are *local* (in CA, they are county taxes) while auto (and in some states, aircraft) registration fees are state fees, so two different things.

Ok, as along as were off into the semantic weeds, it's actually an ad velorem tax, which is a tax on the assessed value of an item of personal property....i.e, a property tax. In this case, or in the case of my automobiles, a property tax assessed by the state.
 
Ok, as along as were off into the semantic weeds, it's actually an ad velorem tax, which is a tax on the assessed value of an item of personal property....i.e, a property tax. In this case, or in the case of my automobiles, a property tax assessed by the state.
Whatever you call it, my point was that the responsible level of government is *different*...property taxes are local/county, so the proper people to get cheesed off at would be your local elected government. Auto registration fees (in states that have them) are state fees, so your state legislature is responsible.

It's not "the government". It's different governments at different levels. That's all I was saying.
 
Whatever you call it, my point was that the responsible level of government is *different*...property taxes are local/county, so the proper people to get cheesed off at would be your local elected government. Auto registration fees (in states that have them) are state fees, so your state legislature is responsible.

It's not "the government". It's different governments at different levels. That's all I was saying.
Right. Property tax on airplanes in California is levied by the county. Property tax on automobiles in Minnesota, which was my point, is levied by the state of Minnesota.
 
We moved to Tennessee 5-years ago, and our attorney recommended keeping the plane out of the Trust, but it would be better if my spouse was a co-owner. When I moved from Wisconsin to Tennessee the plane was less than a year old. I had paid taxes to WI upon FAA registration, then when I got to TN my new state wanted more taxes. So before I added my wife to the registration I checked with my State department of revenue. They confirmed that adding a spouse would have no tax impact, but if I changed from an individual owner to a trust, they would treat that as an aircraft sale, and the State would determine the aircraft value and new tax. Also, both the State and the FAA would want a full copy of any trust.
 
We moved to Tennessee 5-years ago, and our attorney recommended keeping the plane out of the Trust, but it would be better if my spouse was a co-owner. When I moved from Wisconsin to Tennessee the plane was less than a year old. I had paid taxes to WI upon FAA registration, then when I got to TN my new state wanted more taxes. So before I added my wife to the registration I checked with my State department of revenue. They confirmed that adding a spouse would have no tax impact, but if I changed from an individual owner to a trust, they would treat that as an aircraft sale, and the State would determine the aircraft value and new tax. Also, both the State and the FAA would want a full copy of any trust.
I'd check with an actual attorney in TN and (I see now that you did that, so this will be a general comment not specific to your state) not rely on what the clerk on the phone at DOR told you. In my experience, anything out of the ordinary will often get you a wrong answer from the fine employees at whatever bureaucracy you're dealing with. It's not always their fault...how many times do you think the clerk at DOR gets asked about a change of title on an FAA document from "John Q. Public" to "John Q. Public, trustee"?

But, they may be right, who knows.

FWIW, the FAA was quite happy to accept the Certification of Trust (which leaves out any personal financial info and such...just lays out the roles and duties of the trustees, etc.). Your attorney should have provided you with this along with the full trust documentation.

ETA: Here in the great state of California, the following is exempt from use tax:

Transfers Into Revocable Trusts

A transfer of property into a revocable trust is exempt from tax provided all the following apply:
  • The seller has unrestricted power to revoke the trust; and
  • The transfer does not result in any change in the beneficial ownership of the property; and
    • The trust provides that upon revocation of the trust the property reverts back to the seller, and
    • The only consideration given, if any, is the assumption by the trust of an existing loan and the tangible personal property being transferred is the sole collateral for that loan.
(Emphasis added)
 
Last edited:
Since I am into my retirement years and this is a subject that I have been dwelling on, couldn't an owner just fill out an 8050 and give it to their heir, whereupon the owners death the heir transfers it into their name? Yes, that state may collect a tax, but it wouldn't be an inheritance tax.
The other thought is, putting it into the owners and the heirs name (co-ownership), whereupon death, the co-owner than has total ownership.
 
Get an attorney in your state. In Texas it's easy because they have these things called "Transfer on Death Deed" where you enter your property and it doesn't go through probate. For a vehicle you fill out a "Motor Vehicle Beneficiary Designation and Application for Texas Title and/or Registration" and it does the same thing, transfers ownership directly to who you enter in the form and bypasses probate.
 
Get an attorney in your state. In Texas it's easy because they have these things called "Transfer on Death Deed" where you enter your property and it doesn't go through probate. For a vehicle you fill out a "Motor Vehicle Beneficiary Designation and Application for Texas Title and/or Registration" and it does the same thing, transfers ownership directly to who you enter in the form and bypasses probate.
I was told that (At least in Fl.) motor vehicle transfers on death were very different for an aircraft as the FAA controlled the procedure. Needed to use a trust which had its own complications. Wish there was the same beneficiary designation for aircraft vs a motor vehicle but seems not. I know you are in Texas but did your attorney allow you to use a motor vehicle beneficiary designation?

Personally, I went with the FAA approved Heir in Law form that should take precedent and not need the aircraft to go to probate but who knows and I probably won't care.
 
Last edited:
My only point was for the OP to contact an attorney in his state, then gave an example of something in Texas that might not be in other states.
 
My only point was for the OP to contact an attorney in his state, then gave an example of something in Texas that might not be in other states.
Yep, different in different states. I talked to an estate attorney and in Indiana, it is kind of a pita because and airplane doesn't have a "title" like any other vehicle does...
 
My only point was for the OP to contact an attorney in his state, then gave an example of something in Texas that might not be in other states.
Thanks, and understand. I was "hoping" someone had come up with a strategy to place their airframe in a structure that allowed an airframe to pass to a designated person without going through probate. (Or trust) The FAA "Heir-At-Law" document seemed to pass the smell test, and I had it notarized and placed with my estate documents. I love the financial/equity beneficiary documentation process. It's too bad that the FAA cannot come up with a similar process.
 
Since I am into my retirement years and this is a subject that I have been dwelling on, couldn't an owner just fill out an 8050 and give it to their heir, whereupon the owners death the heir transfers it into their name? Yes, that state may collect a tax, but it wouldn't be an inheritance tax.
The other thought is, putting it into the owners and the heirs name (co-ownership), whereupon death, the co-owner than has total owne
No. At the moment of your death, everything you own is frozen and probate courts decide what assets go where and nothinggoes ANYWHERE until the govt weighs in and decides how much they will be taking. Assuming a simple will or no will. Any asset in the trust bypasses this and the trustee can do whatever they want with the assets, including transferring it to themselves. With a will, If you are listed as dead, your wife can’t go in with that form and execute a transfer.

Most trusts have a general asset bucket and this includes all property and financial instruments that were owned by the current trustee (that is you before your death) not specifically moved to the trust via name change. Cars, boats planes, bank accounts, etc. there are some guidelines on value though. Once the asset is above a certain amount, the attorneys recommend registering the asset in the trusts name. Unsure what that number is, but remember my attorney saying over $100k. I would expect most states will not charge tax when moving YOUR assets to YOUR revocable trust. Most treat this not as a sale, but a name change. Irrevocable trusts are more like gifts to others and would be a taxable event.

An example, our attorney had us re title the home from a joint ownership to being solely owned by my wife. Something about balancing asset values in case death tax rates are reduced in the future. This was a non taxable event.
 
Last edited:
No. At the moment of your death, everything you own is frozen and probate courts decide what assets go where and nothinggoes ANYWHERE until the govt weighs in and decides how much they will be taking. Assuming a simple will or no will. Any asset in the trust bypasses this and the trustee can do whatever they want with the assets, including transferring it to themselves. With a will, If you are listed as dead, your wife can’t go in with that form and execute a transfer.

Most trusts have a general asset bucket and this includes all property and financial instruments that were owned by the current trustee (that is you before your death) not specifically moved to the trust via name change. Cars, boats planes, bank accounts, etc. there are some guidelines on value though. Once the asset is above a certain amount, the attorneys recommend registering the asset in the trusts name. Unsure what that number is, but remember my attorney saying over $100k. I would expect most states will not charge tax when moving YOUR assets to YOUR revocable trust. Most treat this not as a sale, but a name change. Irrevocable trusts are more like gifts to others and would be a taxable event.

An example, our attorney had us re title the home from a joint ownership to being solely owned by my wife. Something about balancing asset values in case death tax rates are reduced in the future. This was a non taxable event.
What you really want is to add your wife as co owner on the aircraft registration. This is not a sale, so should not be taxable. Faa should be able to easily remove an owner upon death. Well, easy relative to death issue paperwork, which really aren’t easy. This may still get held up in probate, but otherwise simple and non taxable. Suspect FAA won’t do it untill they see direction from probate.
 
Thanks, and understand. I was "hoping" someone had come up with a strategy to place their airframe in a structure that allowed an airframe to pass to a designated person without going through probate. (Or trust) The FAA "Heir-At-Law" document seemed to pass the smell test, and I had it notarized and placed with my estate documents. I love the financial/equity beneficiary documentation process. It's too bad that the FAA cannot come up with a similar process.
The person who gets the airplane (perhaps from designation in a Will or trust) is who is to fill out and sign the heir at law form, and submitted after you have passed. I have used it several times for clients to successfully transfer aircraft title post death. Example would be a widow who is a sole heir of the decedent, she would be the heir at law in California, entitled to the airplane and the form worked just fine.
 
Granted, I'm not dead yet :), and thank heavens nobody I know who owns a plane is, but if the aircraft is registered to a *trust*, there's no transfer whatsoever to be made (and no probate, at least as far as anything in the trust...the whole *reason* for most revocable living trusts in the first place). The trust owns the plane, the SO and I are the trustees of said trust, and if we both kick off, the trust still owns the plane and the successor trustees administer the trust, including doing whatever they wish the plane (and everything else in the trust, subject to various clauses regarding separate vs. marital property, accounts, IRAs, specific instructions on dispositioning certain assets, etc.).

It was actually very easy to register the plane in the trust, and it's a non-taxable event. Same for real property, collector vehicles, etc.

Still, the best advice is to talk to a lawyer, but it seems from this and other threads that most estate attorneys don't have much or any experience with aircraft and advice seems to be all over the map.
 
The person who gets the airplane (perhaps from designation in a Will or trust) is who is to fill out and sign the heir at law form, and submitted after you have passed. I have used it several times for clients to successfully transfer aircraft title post death. Example would be a widow who is a sole heir of the decedent, she would be the heir at law in California, entitled to the airplane and the form worked just fine.
What if the widow or widower or whomever is *not* the sole heir? Or if an executor or administrator of the estate has been named? This seems like it would apply only in a small minority of cases: sole heir, no executor, etc.
 
What if the widow or widower or whomever is *not* the sole heir? Or if an executor or administrator of the estate has been named? This seems like it would apply only in a small minority of cases: sole heir, no executor, etc.
A will is supposed to be a directive on how you would like your estate to be passed to your loved ones. Probate involves the court system, public records, and offers opportunities for things to go sideways.

A trust sidesteps that process and the executor distributes the estate per the directives of the trust, this will avoid public records, probate, saving time and administrative fees.
 
Of course see a lawyer... I was instructed to keep risky assets like the airplane and cars OUT of the estate for lawsuit purposes. I only own risky items cars, airplanes. My estate owns the money, house, etc.. Should I get sued they don't get anything other than the insurance, as I don't have anything - the estate has it all.
 
Of course see a lawyer... I was instructed to keep risky assets like the airplane and cars OUT of the estate for lawsuit purposes. I only own risky items cars, airplanes. My estate owns the money, house, etc.. Should I get sued they don't get anything other than the insurance, as I don't have anything - the estate has it all.
I’m not a lawyer. It was my understanding that one of the purposes of a trust was to place additional roadblocks in that road to liability.

Wouldn’t placing these high risk assets in its own trust with someone like your attorney as the trustee make sense?

The trust owns and insures the aircraft and you are a named pilot on the insurance policy.

Just a thought. I began thinking about this when I looked at the Montana license plate dodge.

Maybe someone has an answer.
 
What if the widow or widower or whomever is *not* the sole heir? Or if an executor or administrator of the estate has been named? This seems like it would apply only in a small minority of cases: sole heir, no executor, etc.
As others have said, you really need to speak with a professional as in this discussion, there is some validity to many comments, but with caveats, limitations or explanations needed, including when and how to use that form. There is no silver bullet, nor a single answer answer that works for all situations.
 
I began thinking about this when I looked at the Montana license plate dodge.
As you likely are aware, it’s best referred to as the “alleged” Montana license plate dodge. 🤣


When it comes to avoiding taxes on income, aircraft, cars, etc. it’s important to keep in mind that most states’ regulations and enforcement personnel are way, way ahead of any quick “dodges.” There are well-known and legit methods of avoiding and minimizing taxes, most of which are accompanied by equally well-known downsides and disadvantages. Beware anything else.
 
Back
Top