Dan, Nice informative article by Peter Garrison. However, I would take some of his caveats with a grain of salt. All kinds of aircraft and race car oil coolers (heat exchangers) are fed by NACA ducts, mostly successfully. Of course, it does depend on where they are situated on the vehicle as to how efficient they are, locations of high or increasing pressure gradients obviously work better than locations of low or decreasing pressure gradients.
And, regarding the use of NACA ducts for fuel vents, well, I referred to the following three NACA Research memorandums when designing a fuel vent:
- NACA Research Memorandum RM E8A27b (March 29 1948) Investigation of the Aerodynamic and Icing Characteristics of a Recessed Fuel Cell Vent Assembly I-Rear Wall Vent Tube Mounting.
- NACA Research Memorandum RM E8B05a (March 30 1948) Investigation of the Aerodynamic and Icing Characteristics of a Recessed Fuel Cell Vent Assembly II-Ramp Floor Vent Tube Mounting.
- NACA Research Memorandum RM E8C05 (April 23 1948) Investigation of the Aerodynamic and Icing Characteristics of a Recessed Fuel Cell Vent Assembly III-Rear NACA Flush-Inlet-Type Vent.
Although fuel vents do not have much in the way of flow, the NACA duct provides an area of high pressure on the aft face, and additionally, since they are flush, provides excellent ice resistant pressure source, as well as having low drag.
But one application where NACA ducts are entirely misused is as an exit duct (ogive apex pointing aft). You see these on NASCAR race cars on the rear windows. Yeah, if they only read the literature on NACA ducts.