turbo
Well Known Member
Does anyone have any info on this unit? Did some searching and found nothing. Thanks
https://flyingsafer.com/2065
https://flyingsafer.com/2065
any info on this unit?
I love this idea - if the desiccant were sitting on the exhaust pipes it would dry every flight....
it begs the question.... should there be a lightweight firewall mounted engine crankcase air dehumidifier that would automatically activate after shutdown and would accept an external power source. well, I can see all kinds of issues with this but it would be possible. the power to run a small fish pump is very low and if it cycles it would be even lower. the drying of the agent could be done in flight with alternator power. a manual valve could be used to open the system. yeah, what if you forget to close the valve before flight..... there are issues to overcome.
I love this idea - if the desiccant were sitting on the exhaust pipes it would dry every flight.
I have the mentioned engine dryer, and it seems to work, but I honestly won't know if it really helped my engine for another 10-20 years. I have tested with a humidity probe and it does reduce the humidity, which certainly can't hurt.
I love this idea - if the desiccant were sitting on the exhaust pipes it would dry every flight.
The weak part is the humidity sensor, which will eventually give up the ghost.
I think there is some merit to having a timer enabled function. I have a valve that I bought recently that will allow the pump to exhaust to ambient for, say 30 minutes, then go into the closed loop with the dessicant. I just haven't coded it yet because it's stuck behind a large project. No sensor required in this fashion.
V
How large of a desiccant bottle does it take? If a metal one was attached to an exhaust pipe it would cook dry on every flight.

Have one in N Florida. Did not keep internal engine humidity below 50%. Switched to Drybot a couple years ago and Drybotit works MUCH better. Worth the extra $$. Internal humidity is always below 40%. Use logger to continuously monitor internal temp and humidity.I am considering one of these and wondered if there has been any experience since 2023 that is relevant. Anyone like it? Anyone not like it?
Thanks. Drybot is only down to 40%? It was my understanding (I can't remember how I came to that understanding though) that 40% is the maximum humidity to protect the engine. I'd like to do better than that. I have a DIY version with desiccant that usually runs between 22 and28% but the desiccant isn't lasting very long anymore and I was looking for a more practical solution.Have one in N Florida. Did not keep internal engine humidity below 50%. Switched to Drybot a couple years ago and Drybotit works MUCH better. Worth the extra $$. Internal humidity is always below 40%. Use logger to continuously monitor internal temp and humidity.
