What's new
Van's Air Force

Don't miss anything! Register now for full access to the definitive RV support community.

RV3 Gusty Crosswinds

RayJr

Active Member
Hello,
A few months ago I posted asking about transition training into an RV3. I’m happy to report I’m now about 6 hours into RV3 flying. You guys were so helpful with tips on getting started(thanks again) I thought I’d see what you thought about my new question.

Last night I was landing with a 15kG22 wind about 50 degrees off the runway. The crosswind wasn’t an issue but I found the gusts to be a handful. The plane always feels light and nimble but felt especially light in these conditions. It was bouncing around more than I enjoyed trying to get it on the ground.

I have been flying over the fence at about 70mph with full flaps and landing on three point so far. Almost always in a side slip of some degree. I assume more speed was justifiable in this situation. I didn’t feel the need to go back and immediately trying again after getting on the ground.

I’m wondering what your SOPs for gusty crosswind days might be. And what you consider too windy for RV3 operations. Just a reminder I’m new to TW and new to Vans. I did TW training but saw little crosswind and no gusts during that training.

Thanks again for all the wisdom

Ray
 
Modified 3 point

I never land any RV in 3 point. I use modified 3 point for lack of better terminology. Especially in gust conditions. Also, when windy, I use max aileron defection as my flap setting. The modified 3 point landing technique is basically landing nose up, and when the mains touch, immediate forward stick to keep mains planted while dumping flaps. Having the flaps set at max aileron provides some lift and perfect setting if you need to do go around. The -3 is a little more squirrelly than the other Tailwheel rv but not unmanageable.
 
Sounds like you're doing just fine!

I do not posses the magic golden arm, so I try to think about things. Opinion, but generally I decline to add approach speed because it is gusting.

On one hand, a sudden reduction of wind speed might result in a sudden sink rate. On the other hand, our airplanes respond quickly to additional throttle and/or pitch.

A higher approach speed can offset the chance of sudden sink, and may feel more positive. However, you gotta get rid of that velocity eventually, either floating along just above the runway, or rolling after touchdown. I don't think either is pleasant with a gusting crosswind. I prefer to get it down without a lot of float, and done, i.e. as close to stall as possible so it doesn't try to fly again with the next gust. As for ground roll, well, slower is just better.
 
Although I sold my RV3 in 2019, I have had to deal with some stout cross wind on landing. This is part of the deal in South West Kansas. I always used alot of aleron into the wind along with rudder to slip on touchdown. Also, I always three point landed in these conditions to get the tail stuck soon as possible. Your speeds seem about right. I have landed in 30 plus knot direct cross winds (But I DIDN'T enjoy it). Good transition training really helps.
 
Crosswind landings.......

Last night I was landing with a 15kG22 wind about 50 degrees off the runway. The crosswind wasn’t an issue but I found the gusts to be a handful. The plane always feels light and nimble but felt especially light in these conditions. It was bouncing around more than I enjoyed trying to get it on the ground.

I have been flying over the fence at about 70mph with full flaps and landing on three point so far. Almost always in a side slip of some degree. I assume more speed was justifiable in this situation. I didn’t feel the need to go back and immediately trying again after getting on the ground.

Yeah: that was a sign that it was time to put the airplane in the hangar....:eek:

I was told sometime ago that, in some tail wheel instruction, wheel landings aren't being taught! :eek: Huh. Mistake. This is likely to get a number of different responses as to what works best but here is my take:

I probably have 100 hours in nose gear aircraft; the remainder of my hours since 1972 have been in tail wheel aircraft, including SuzieQ, my RV-4. By discussion heard here, a direct crosswind component of 15 kts is about maximum. I know I have landed in stronger (frequent flights to Texas at one point in my life and one memorable landing in Missouri) and things can get sporty. I will do a low approach over said runway. If I run out of rudder to stay straight on my overflight, I will not have enough rudder to make a good landing.

SuzieQ does not like to do three point landings. I can drag the tail wheel, then the wings quit and the (short type) main gear slams down on the runway. :rolleyes: Most all my tail wheel landings are wheel landings, especially in the larger aircraft (C-180/185). The Cub likes them as well. All except with gusty winds, are tail pretty low; so near-three point. The debate is with what technique will you have more control once you quit flying. Gusting crosswind, I will land with one notch of flaps (20*) and a higher approach speed so I can "fly" her onto the runway, dumping the flaps as soon as I have all three on the runway. With speed, the tail will have more authority. "The tail has to quit flying sometime". Yeah, but I would like to have the authority until it does. My normal landing is full (40*) flaps on final, 65-70 over the fence, holding off until she settles down on the runway. Ground effect is a wonderful thing....as long as you don't land fast. Then you get to see what the other end of the runway looks like.;)

What will work is what you find works for you. You will get various opinions about what works best; you need to figure out what works for you and YOUR airplane.

Welcome to The Club! You have one of the best and most nimble aircraft on the planet! Not to mention one of the best looking!
 
Last edited:
Yes, the RV-3 is light, and as importantly, the wing is closer to the ground than other models, so you get a little more ground effect float - just when you really want to touch down. This is one reason they can be a bit more difficult to three-point in a cross-wind…you’re getting slow, have poorer control because of that, and the cushion of air is keeping you from touching down. That all leads to a less comfortable place to be. Flaps also lower the stall speed, and you’re depending on hitting stall speed to stop flying wen you are three-pointing.

All that leads to the answer of why wheel landings have been the go-to technique in crosswinds for taildraggers for a hundred years. Honestly, I rarely three point the RV’s becasue tail-low wheel landings are so reliable and predictable. If I need to land really short, then sure - three point is the way to go, and I keep myself proficient on all possible ways to land.

For the RV-3, if the cross-winds are stiff, I leave the flaps up and use the controls I ned to wheel land it and not drift sideways at touchdown, then carefully pull of power to bring the tail down and plant it. Yup - it’s a transition point that lasts a couple of seconds - having a little more speed helps the control at that time, but if you have too much, you lift back off and float. If at any time you can’t make the airplane go where you want it to go, add power, lift off, and come back for another try.

It CAN be a bit uncomfortable early in your taildragger career, but practice makes you better - just ease in to it, and don’t bite off more crosswind than you can chew until you acquire the feel for it.
 
Way I land my RV3

Ray
Various ideas and opinions, but most important with what ever method you find you are comfortable with practice and go slowly to gain the experience.

This is mine
Nearly all of my flying is off short grass strips so this is my 2p worth.
Like Shannon I have always used a three pointer and as soon as I touch I dump the flaps to keep me planted.
Speed control is very important using this method.
I don't leave my flaps up, although more comfortable on the approach I found I had no lift to dump after touchdown added to the higher touchdown speed it felt more squirrely on the ground and reduced the effect of the brakes.

Good luck and enjoy
Rob
RV3 G-BVDC
 
I would probably for the next 10 hours or so use a bit more conservative crosswind numbers. I stayed below 10 knots including gusts for the first 20 hours
 
Call this a glider pilot technique if you will, but sometimes it helps to line up into the wind as much as the runway width will allow. Judgement call. You may have heard of the glider pilot that landed across the runway in a 90° crosswind and stopped with plenty of room. I'm not advocating this technique for the faint of heart, but I find myself cheating a bit this way if the crosswind warrants it. Yes, and a wheel landing should be in your repetoire!
 
Some great advice given. Wheel landings are not difficult to learn. Once you are comfortable with them, you can practice cross wind landing technique without any cross wind. Set up final wing low into your imaginary wind, cross control appropriately to keep the ship straight, and touch down on your “windward” wheel.
Practice both right and left “wind” so you don’t get handed.
While this is not a substitute for actual cross wind experience, it can help gain confidence and feel.
 
Angling across the runway...

Sometimes it helps to line up into the wind as much as the runway width will allow. You may have heard of the glider pilot that landed across the runway in a 90° crosswind and stopped with plenty of room. I'm not advocating this technique for the faint of heart, but I find myself cheating a bit this way if the crosswind warrants it. Yes, and a wheel landing should be in your repertoire!

I have done this since I started flying. It is easy in the Cub to start my takeoff roll near the downwind "corner" of the runway, angling into the wind to take degrees off of the crosswind component. Landing is done the same way as long as you pay attention to how much runway you need to land at an angle. 5 degrees off a crosswind can sometimes make a difference. I have landed on a 90 degree taxiway (Durango, CO) and once, in Casper, WY, landed on the ramp with a 30 gusting to 45 breeze. I hesitated to mention those techniques here as they have been discouraged by some in pervious posts but it still applies to landing an RV and I have used it. Practice with less wind will get you used to what that looks like and how much runway you need to allow for that modified landing. OMHO; YMMV
 
Some great advice given. Wheel landings are not difficult to learn. Once you are comfortable with them, you can practice cross wind landing technique without any cross wind. Set up final wing low into your imaginary wind, cross control appropriately to keep the ship straight, and touch down on your “windward” wheel.
Practice both right and left “wind” so you don’t get handed.
While this is not a substitute for actual cross wind experience, it can help gain confidence and feel.

I did this just the other day in Florida - was doing a Multi-Engine Seaplane course, and we had dead calm winds the whole time, so mostly glassy water. Had to simulate everything, and my instructor didn’t bother with crosswinds. Of course, the examiner wanted to see a crosswind landing, so I thought about it, and just touched the “upwind” float first, and he was pleased…. So yes, landing one wheel first is great practice!
 
I agree with this

I would probably for the next 10 hours or so use a bit more conservative crosswind numbers. I stayed below 10 knots including gusts for the first 20 hours

You are being too aggressive with how good you think you are. Your landings will completely change as you gain more experience with the plane. After you have several hundred landings you will have much higher confidence and different techniques.

I fly an RV-4 and completely transitioned to wheel landings except when I want to practice three points. I had a hard time early on not bouncing. I learned that setting one front wheel down first eliminates the tendency to bounce by cutting the spring constant in half.
 
Hello RayJr,
Like you, I am relatively new to the tail dragger and RV3b. Up until recently, I've only landed 3 point, as that was the only type of landing I experienced during my 4 hours of transition training.
Having replaced the rear HS spar recently due to SB-00036, headed out to do circuits at a nearby small island (Alert Bay) with a nice big paved runway at the top of the island. The down drafts, gusty crosswinds and lack of currency made the landings quite the challenge, bouncy and required several overshoots.
Approaching to land in the 3 point attitude makes it difficult for me to accurately gauge flare height, having to use peripheral vision to gauge the flare due to almost no forward visibility. The high angle of attack and slow speed prior to touch down can be a handful to try setting down gently on the pavement, especially with the gusting winds.
After a sweaty afternoon of circuits decided it was time to break my ingrained tricycle gear habit of up elevator all the way through the flare and rollout and try a wheel landing.
The next day was much calmer, so back to Alert Bay and circuits. I tried a slightly higher final approach speed of 72-75 mph for a wheel landing, keeping the runway in view the whole time, rather than pulling back on the stick and slowly have the runway in front disappear from sight.
The mains eventually settled on the pavement and as soon as they touched gently pushed forward on the stick. Wow... what a difference. I could see where I was going and it was a nice gentle landing.
I did a whole lot of wheel landings and all of them were a significant improvement over my 3 point landings.
As others in this thread with a LOT more experience than I have with tail draggers have suggested, wheel landings have been around for 100 years and in my view, easier than the 3 point. For me... I just had to get over some old tricycle gear habits and (gentle) push rather than pull on touch down.
Bonus with a wheel landing, I'll be able to see the Elk, bears, geese and other critters on the runway during rollout, rather than rolling out blindly.
Try the wheel landing its easier.
 
Sounds a bit like your seating position might be a little low. If you have the room, try a cushion to change your eye height.

Dave
 
Thank you for the suggestion David, but having opted to wear a helmet had to reduce my eye height to avoid scuffing up the canopy. Prior to using a helmet my forward visibility was already pretty limited during the landing flare, always being an attempted 3 pointer.
For me, wheel landing is a significant improvement over my often less than perfect 3 point landings.
The RV3 is an awesome aircraft and yours is going to be exceptional when completed. Having recently replaced the rear horizontal spar on my RV under the guidance of a skillful multiple RV builder, I am in awe of yourself and all the others that undertake the painstaking project of building an airplane from scratch.
 
Folks could adjust their thinking a bit on what a “good” and “bad” three point is. My WWII test pilot and mentor would just scoff at me if I “greased” a three point. He wanted the airplane to be done flying and “plop” onto the runway. The antiques I flew had gear that would accept that. RV’s, especially round leg models, are so springy, a plop usually produces a bounce. This isn’t a problem as long as you bounce straight and keep the stick firmly in your lap. When you add a cross wind, keeping that bounce straight is more challenging. Keeping the stick in your lap isn’t as easy when you’re bouncing around and it is a common mistake I see in tailwheel pilots. Once you release pressure, the fight is on, oscillations and induce bounces ensue….
Regardless, you should be able to safely land in either configuration in any conditions within the airplane and your limits. A “good” three point landing may not feel good, but might be better than you think.
 
Back
Top