VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

-POSTING RULES
-Advertise in here!
- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Keep VAF Going
Donate methods

Point your
camera app here
to donate fast.

  #1  
Old 07-03-2022, 08:35 AM
gasman gasman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 4,523
Default After 50 Years, Is It Still The Best??

I posted this article in 2007 https://vansairforce.net/community/s...ad.php?t=19692

My question to those who have owned one and moved on to bigger and better. Is it still the best handling homebuilt out there??
__________________
VAF #897 Warren Moretti
2022 =VAF= Dues PAID
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2022, 09:09 AM
Rich Pulman Rich Pulman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: CYQA Canada
Posts: 144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gasman View Post
I posted this article in 2007 https://vansairforce.net/community/s...ad.php?t=19692

My question to those who have owned one and moved on to bigger and better. Is it still the best handling homebuilt out there??
I don't know about other makes of homebuilt aircraft, but compared to the other RV models I've flown (7, 8, 10) it is certainly the most responsive and nimble of the bunch.
__________________
RV-3A (C-FARV) bought, then sold
RV-8 (C-FJSE) bought
RV-8 (C-FRAP) still building....

Donated 2022
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2022, 09:15 AM
rmarshall234 rmarshall234 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 396
Default Still the best

For what it was designed to do, I'd say "yes". Van invented the term "total performance" and with a speed envelope from 50 - 200 mph he pretty much proved his point. And then there are all the refinements through the years and the support network - as evidenced by this forum here - I don't think anyone else has come close. They've moved on to other missions like STOL aircraft instead and the guys at Cub Crafters have had similar (but different) success.

Now as for "best handling", I'm pretty sure the Acroduster I'm building will be a better handling airplane than my RV-3 was and is more aesthetically appealing, but that's comparing apples to oranges.
__________________
Robert Marshall
www.robertsairservices.com
RV-3 N333LT - 500hrs PIC
AFF Skydiving Instructor (Ret)
IF1 Reno Racer (Ret)
IF1 Crew Chief
A&P / IA
Parachute Rigger
Acroduster SA750 - Almost finished!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2022, 12:16 PM
RV8JD RV8JD is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 543
Default

Here is the article (originally published in the November 1973 issue of Air Progress) from the website of the author, Budd Davisson:

http://www.airbum.com/pireps/PirepRV3.html
__________________
Carl N.
RV-8
KAWO

Last edited by RV8JD : 07-03-2022 at 12:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2022, 01:20 PM
Ed_Wischmeyer's Avatar
Ed_Wischmeyer Ed_Wischmeyer is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,763
Default

Some years back, there was an article in Kitplanes, I believe, asking three writers this same question. Two of the three said RV-4. That was my second choice behind the Thunder Mustang, chosen because it's ailerons didn't get heavy at speed. At least, not up to the mid-200s.

Of course, there's more than handling as airplane criteria -- performance, ride in turbulence, maintainability, interior comfort, visibility, etc. Not that the RVs don't do well, there, mostly.
__________________
RV-9A at KSAV (Savannah, GA; dual G3X Touch with autopilot, GTN650, GTX330ES, GDL52 ADSB-In)
Previously RV-4, RV-8, RV-8A, AirCam, Cessna 175
ATP CFII PhD, so I have no excuses when I screw up
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2022, 01:43 PM
swjohnsey swjohnsey is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Kingsville, TX
Posts: 495
Default

I don't think so. I had 0-32 160hp RV-3 with wood prop and RV-4 with IO-360 and CS. I think the RV-4 is better, faster, more range.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.