What's new
Van's Air Force

Don't miss anything! Register now for full access to the definitive RV support community.

Why are some RV12's EAB and some ELSA?

dabney

Well Known Member
Friend
I am looking to buy an RV12 and have been told I could run into ones that are registered as EAB or ELSA.

What are the differences in ownership/operation etc?

When I asked one owner of a RV12 about the Operating Limitations, he said there were none. Is that possible?
 
The main difference for you is that if the plane is registered as E-AB, you must hire an A&P to do the annual inspection (unless the builder does it). If it is registered as E-LSA, then you can do the annual inspection yourself after taking a 16 hour class and getting a repairman's certificate.
There must be operating limitations.
It it is wise to have a pre-buy inspection by someone like Vic Syracuse.
 
Builder's choice. To qualify as ELSA the aircraft must be built exactly per plans and all parts must be purchased from the kit manufacturer.
Some people prefer to make minor or major modifications during the build. Or in some cases they may already have an engine or avionics and prefer to install these as opposed to ordering new from Vans. The builder my opt for EAB so that he/she doesn't have to go to class to obtain the repairman certificate. EAB can be modified to take it out of the Light-Sport parameters. ELSA cannot. There can be a multitude of reasons.
EAB is not necessarily better or worse than ELSA. Just different.
 
Hey Mel -

Is it true that the classification at first Airworthiness is the only one that can ever be? Meaning, it's either S-LSA or E-LSA forever.

There's a conversation on some other forum about this, and I thought there was only one chance to select.

Thanks.
 
Hey Mel -
Is it true that the classification at first Airworthiness is the only one that can ever be? Meaning, it's either S-LSA or E-LSA forever.
There's a conversation on some other forum about this, and I thought there was only one chance to select.
Thanks.

If it is EAB, it's forever. If it's ELSA, it's forever. If it's SLSA it may be changed to ELSA.
 
And if SLSA is changed to ELSA it is forever - no going back...
That?s actually not true. If you can get the manufacturer (Van?s) to do a full conformity inspection, and the aircraft hasn?t been changed in any way so that it does actually conform, then a new SLSA airworthiness certificate can be issued. Just not very practical.
 
That?s actually not true. If you can get the manufacturer (Van?s) to do a full conformity inspection, and the aircraft hasn?t been changed in any way so that it does actually conform, then a new SLSA airworthiness certificate can be issued. Just not very practical.

Yep. Theoretically possible, probably not ever actually done.

There's no path from E-LSA to E-AB because E-LSA does not have a 51% amateur built requirement.
 
When I asked one owner of a RV12 about the Operating Limitations, he said there were none. Is that possible?

No one has answered this part of your question.

No it is not possible. Even SLAS's have operating limitations.

Perhaps he lost them.
 
When I asked one owner of a RV12 about the Operating Limitations, he said there were none. Is that possible?

Sorry, I missed that part of the question. Like Scott says, Operating Limitations are issued as part of the Airworthiness Certificate and must be in the airplane during any and all operations.
 
Another point for a buyer, if you feel that the ELSA is "better" because it was built strictly according to a standard, think again. The day AFTER the ELSA certificate, most any changes you might dream up are perfectly legal and do not have to be in accordance with the ELSA requirements. If you like your lawnmower engine, you can now fly behind your lawnmower engine. After all, it is EXPERIMENTAL!
 
Another point for a buyer, if you feel that the ELSA is "better" because it was built strictly according to a standard, think again. The day AFTER the ELSA certificate, most any changes you might dream up are perfectly legal and do not have to be in accordance with the ELSA requirements. If you like your lawnmower engine, you can now fly behind your lawnmower engine. After all, it is EXPERIMENTAL!
The only reason I would prefer E-LSA as a buyer is the ability to get the repairman certificate and sign off on the condition inspection. Of course an E-AB RV-12 was most likely not built strictly to plans (why else would you make it E-AB?), but one would hope that any deviations would be discovered and discussed during the prebuy inspection. No matter what the airworthiness certificate says, just like any other airplane you really need to know exactly what you're buying -- or be willing to deal with the inevitable surprises.
 
The only reason I would prefer E-LSA as a buyer is the ability to get the repairman certificate and sign off on the condition inspection. Of course an E-AB RV-12 was most likely not built strictly to plans (why else would you make it E-AB?), but one would hope that any deviations would be discovered and discussed during the prebuy inspection. No matter what the airworthiness certificate says, just like any other airplane you really need to know exactly what you're buying -- or be willing to deal with the inevitable surprises.

The possibility here is that the builder may already have an engine, prop, avionics, etc., and prefer to use those instead of buying new from the kit manufacturer.
 
The possibility here is that the builder may already have an engine, prop, avionics, etc., and prefer to use those instead of buying new from the kit manufacturer.

Yep, that's the main reason people go amateur-built instead of ELSA on an RV-12. But there is another, obscure reason to go AB. That is to allow the ability to lease the aircraft to another entity. By regulation, ELSA cannot be leased (Ref. 91.319(f)). This is why EAA built the "One Week Wonder" RV-12 as amateur-built, even though it is built strictly in accordance with Van's instructions. The plan is to lease the aircraft to the EAA employee flying club after it finishes it's promotional touring duties.

So, as mentioned before, when one is looking to purchase a flying RV-12, make sure to understand what airworthiness certificate it has, and why. As with any experimental aircraft, each one is unique.
 
E-AB vs ELSA

I know of one RV12 built exactly to plans and certificated as E-AB so he could get the repairman certificate instead of taking a 16 hour course. Then he started his 40 hour Phase 1!
 
Starting to build an RV-12iS and I think I may certify as E-AB just incase I want to install the IFR package and fly on an actual IMC path. Not sure what advantage certifying as E-LSA provides.
 
One of the reasons I went E-LSA was so subsequent owners could opt to take the 16 hr inspection course to allow them to perform their own CIs. Thought that might be a positive selling point for some.
 
Light Sport Pilot Certificate doesn't qualify to fly EAB airplane

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression that a pilot with a Light Sport license and a "Driver's License medical" is legal to fly an E-LSA certificated airplane but not an E-AB, since an E-AB requires at least a Private Pilot license and 3rd Class Medical.

I'd think that this could be a reason to choose E-LSA over EAB registration.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression that a pilot with a Light Sport license and a "Driver's License medical" is legal to fly an E-LSA certificated airplane but not an E-AB, since an E-AB requires at least a Private Pilot license and 3rd Class Medical.

I'd think that this could be a reason to choose E-LSA over EAB registration.

Not quite. :)

An aircraft flown by a sport pilot doesn't have to be certified as light sport, but it must meet the performance definition of a light-sport aircraft as defined in 14 CFR 1.1.

AOPA has some useful information on this subject.
 
Starting to build an RV-12iS and I think I may certify as E-AB just incase I want to install the IFR package and fly on an actual IMC path. Not sure what advantage certifying as E-LSA provides.

Nothing prohibits you from flying an E-LSA in IMC. You are not bound by the language in the POH/AFM.. only the language in your Airworthiness Certificate. (S-LSA is a different story). However, you "should" have more than just the IFR package installed (heated pitot, alternate air, a second ADAHARS unit, etc).
 
Yep. Theoretically possible, probably not ever actually done.

I do know of one case where an E-LSA was returned to S-LSA. It was not a kit-built. It was originally an S-LSA and it was NOT a Van's.

I will not reveal the name of the manufacturer "to protect the innocent".

I will agree that it is EXTREMELY rare. And the case I'm referring to was an exception.
 
Last edited:
Nothing prohibits you from flying an E-LSA in IMC. You are not bound by the language in the POH/AFM.. only the language in your Airworthiness Certificate. (S-LSA is a different story). However, you "should" have more than just the IFR package installed (heated pitot, alternate air, a second ADAHARS unit, etc).

Did the ASTM on LSA finally get revised? Last I checked, it does not differentiate between E or S LSA for prohibiting flight in IMC.

https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2010/september/03/lsa-flight-into-imc-to-be-prohibited

Straight off the Vans avionics ordering page:
Quote

Note that the current Light Sport Aircraft standards (ELSA and SLSA) preclude operation in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC). While aircraft licensed under the LSA standard may be operated "in the system" under Instrument Flight Rules, such as in a training environment, certification as LSA currently prohibits IMC operations. Also, note that EAB-licensed aircraft are not restricted in this fashion.

End quote
 
Last edited:
Nothing prohibits you from flying an E-LSA in IMC. You are not bound by the language in the POH/AFM.. only the language in your Airworthiness Certificate. (S-LSA is a different story). However, you "should" have more than just the IFR package installed (heated pitot, alternate air, a second ADAHARS unit, etc).

I am curious as to what limitations a DAR has on writing operating limits in the Airworthiness Certificate for an E-LSA. Supposedly he is inspecting something that was built as an ASTM conforming item (the S-LSA), and the ASTM specifically prohibits IMC operation. Can a DAR make whatever non-conforming modifications to the S-LSA limitations they want in writing the AW certificate? Is there any reason they could not also increase the gross weight or airspeed limitations as an example? The presumption here is the POH, which is part of the conforming item presented for inspection, does not apply to the limitations written in the AW certificate.

John Salak
RV-12 N896HS (EAB)
 
I don’t have specific details but I have a friend who has a Tecnam LSA. He had the plane recertified as an ELSA and when he did this he also had the operating limitations changed to allow IFR if so equipped. Again not an expert but he is and said you can change the operating limitations of an ELSA to allow IFR.



Starting to build an RV-12iS and I think I may certify as E-AB just incase I want to install the IFR package and fly on an actual IMC path. Not sure what advantage certifying as E-LSA provides.
 
I am curious as to what limitations a DAR has on writing operating limits in the Airworthiness Certificate for an E-LSA.

Opening limits aren’t issued randomly, there issued under the guidance of FAA order 8130.2J. If you want to see the differences between S-LSA, E-LSA and E-AB download a copy https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/order/faa_order_8130.2j.pdf
have a look at appendix D and build yourself a set of each.

Supposedly he is inspecting something that was built as an ASTM conforming item (the S-LSA), and the ASTM specifically prohibits IMC operation. Can a DAR make whatever non-conforming modifications to the S-LSA limitations they want in writing the AW certificate? Is there any reason they could not also increase the gross weight or airspeed limitations as an example?

It’s not the DAR, it’s the FAA that allows IFR/IMC operations though the opening limits. The airspace we fly is the FAAs domain, ASTM has no jurisdiction

The presumption here is the POH, which is part of the conforming item presented for inspection, does not apply to the limitations written in the AW certificate.

Look at the op-limits, compliance to operations dictated in the Manufacture supplied POH only applies to an S-LSA. If your an E-LSA add the required equipment and modify the page after certification, after all you are experimental

An E-LSA only needs to match its S-LSA duplicate at the time of certification. Once certified you can modify it all you want as long as you keep it within the definition of an LSA (FAR section 1.1) and follow your op-limits
 
Opening limits aren’t issued randomly, there issued under the guidance of FAA order 8130.2J. If you want to see the differences between S-LSA, E-LSA and E-AB download a copy https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/order/faa_order_8130.2j.pdf
have a look at appendix D and build yourself a set of each.



It’s not the DAR, it’s the FAA that allows IFR/IMC operations though the opening limits. The airspace we fly is the FAAs domain, ASTM has no jurisdiction



Look at the op-limits, compliance to operations dictated in the Manufacture supplied POH only applies to an S-LSA. If your an E-LSA add the required equipment and modify the page after certification, after all you are experimental

An E-LSA only needs to match its S-LSA duplicate at the time of certification. Once certified you can modify it all you want as long as you keep it within the definition of an LSA (FAR section 1.1) and follow your op-limits

Thanks for the reference. For LSA, FAR 1.1 appears to be the only limitation on what you cannot modify after certification or change by AW limitations, an in-flight adjustable prop for example.

My OLs state "Instrument Flight operations are authorized if ... 91.205(d)...". It was built that way from the start and is one reason I went EAB. Looking back on the build, as an EAB I was able to incorporate a lot of changes that originated from builders on VAF before Van's eventually incorporated many of them in the KAI. To Eric H's question, going EAB makes it a lot easier to add some items like a heated pitot to the wing while you are building vs doing it post-ELSA certification with the wings closed up. Same for adding a COMM2, NAV/GS/LOC and of course more antennas and wiring. You may also want to consider a second battery / emergency buss electrical change to keep the fuel pumps, ECU running, and essential panel running.

John Salak
RV-12 N896HS
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression that a pilot with a Light Sport license and a "Driver's License medical" is legal to fly an E-LSA certificated airplane but not an E-AB, since an E-AB requires at least a Private Pilot license and 3rd Class Medical.

I'd think that this could be a reason to choose E-LSA over EAB registration.

Almost right. Change the last 3 words of the last line of your first paragraph from “3rd Class Medical” to “BasicMed medical”
 
Opening limits aren’t issued randomly, there issued under the guidance of FAA order 8130.2J. If you want to see the differences between S-LSA, E-LSA and E-AB download a copy https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/order/faa_order_8130.2j.pdf

Once certified you can modify it all you want as long as you keep it within the definition of an LSA (FAR section 1.1) and follow your op-limits


And herein lies the confusion.

Can you modify your ELSA after certification? Yes
Can you modify your ELSA to the point it no longer meets the definition of being an LSA? No (it would be nice, wouldn’t it?)
What defines the certification requirements for an ELSA? ASTM 2245-20
What does ASTM 2245-20 say about VFR/IFR? Limited to VFR flight only.

When you build your ELSA, you’ll placard it to say flight in IMC prohibited. Can you peel that off after certification and go fly in IMC? Sure you can. Will anyone question you or care? Probably not… unless you are involved in a mishap. Then I’m sure your insurance company will turn away from you in a heartbeat and the FAA will question why you flew an aircraft in IMC that wasn’t certificated to do so. That the aircraft is “experimental” is moot. It’s not an EAB, it’s an LSA.

But hey folks, it’s your license. What’s it worth to you?
 
And herein lies the confusion.

Can you modify your ELSA after certification? Yes
Can you modify your ELSA to the point it no longer meets the definition of being an LSA? No (it would be nice, wouldn’t it?)
What defines the certification requirements for an ELSA? ASTM 2245-20
What does ASTM 2245-20 say about VFR/IFR? Limited to VFR flight only.

Actually the current FAA accepted standard is F2245-16c for “Design and Performance” and “Required Equipment.” Here is the complete list of the FAA LSA Accepted Standards;
https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/gen_av/light_sport/media/StandardsChart.pdf

It doesn’t matter what the ASTM standard says about IFR operation, The FAA writes rules and they permit IFR operation via the op-limits.

When you build your ELSA, you’ll placard it to say flight in IMC prohibited. Can you peel that off after certification and go fly in IMC? Sure you can. Will anyone question you or care? Probably not… unless you are involved in a mishap. Then I’m sure your insurance company will turn away from you in a heartbeat and the FAA will question why you flew an aircraft in IMC that wasn’t certificated to do so.

you omitted this line of my post, maybe I wasn’t clear. Here it is [with a bit more detail];
“If your an E-LSA, add the required equipment [for IFR flight] and modify the [POH] page after certification…’

I personally don’t care if you build E-AB or E-LSA. My point is that you will get the exact same operating limits for IFR/IMC operation either way it’s licensed.

That the aircraft is “experimental” is moot. It’s not an EAB, it’s an LSA.

But hey folks, it’s your license. What’s it worth to you?

Look a FAR 21.191. There are nine sub groups for “Experimental” certification, including both E-AB and E-LSA. LSA is one path into certification. Both E-AB and E-LSA get specific benefits/penalties for being “experimental” But for IFR operation they are treated equally.
 
I personally don’t care if you build E-AB or E-LSA. My point is that you will get the exact same operating limits for IFR/IMC operation either way it’s licensed.
Look a FAR 21.191. There are nine sub groups for “Experimental” certification, including both E-AB and E-LSA. LSA is one path into certification. Both E-AB and E-LSA get specific benefits/penalties for being “experimental” But for IFR operation they are treated equally.

True statement!
 
Ugh..!

I tried to re-read this thread to make sure I had all the rules down pat......but then decided to do something less confusing.... like drinking a fifth of Jack Daniels and unscrambling a Rubik's Cube while strapped to an inversion table.....

This is most certainly the quintessence of FAA rulemaking .....
 
Last edited:
I tried to re-read this thread to make sure I had all the rules down pat......but then decided to do something less confusing.... like drinking a fifth of Jack Daniels and unscrambling a Rubik's Cube while strapped to an inversion table.....

This is most certainly the quintessence of FAA rulemaking .....

LOL!!! We need a "like" button on this forum.
 
There seems to be some confusion with the terms LSA and E-LSA.
LSA describes the characteristics of an aircraft as defined by our government. LSA has nothing to do with aircraft registration.
There is no aircraft registration category called LSA, just as there are no aircraft registration categories called high-wing or tail-dragger.
Many type certificated aircraft are LSA.
Homebuilt aircraft can be registered as E-AB or E-LSA and other ways.
Both E-AB and E-LSA are Experimental. If someone says that they are going to register their aircraft as experimental,
they need to be more specific. Do they mean E-AB or E-LSA or E-Exhibition or what?
 
I tried to re-read this thread to make sure I had all the rules down pat......but then decided to do something less confusing.... like drinking a fifth of Jack Daniels and unscrambling a Rubik's Cube while strapped to an inversion table.....

This is most certainly the quintessence of FAA rulemaking .....

Sorry to say that I work for a not to be named agency of a not to be named government and it’s what we do. And we’re really good at it.

Pass the bottle…. I’m farther than 50 feet from an aircraft.
 
Well, Kinda........

There seems to be some confusion with the terms LSA and E-LSA.
LSA describes the characteristics of an aircraft as defined by our government. LSA has nothing to do with aircraft registration.
There is no aircraft registration category called LSA, just as there are no aircraft registration categories called high-wing or tail-dragger.
Many type certificated aircraft are LSA.
Homebuilt aircraft can be registered as E-AB or E-LSA and other ways.
Both E-AB and E-LSA are Experimental. If someone says that they are going to register their aircraft as experimental,
they need to be more specific. Do they mean E-AB or E-LSA or E-Exhibition or what?

There IS a category called Light-Sport. It is for S-LSA, certificated under §21.190
 
Here are the actual conditions on my E-LSA AW certificate. This is the same language as used for E-AB and S-LSA.


21. Kinds of operations authorized:
Day VFR flight operations are authorized. (47)​

22. Night flight operations are authorized if the instruments specified in § 91.205(c) are installed, operational, and maintained per the applicable
requirements of part 91. (48)

23. Instrument flight operations are authorized if the instruments specified in § 91.205(d) are installed, operational, compliant with the performance
requirements of, and maintained per the applicable regulations. All maintenance or inspection of this equipment must be recorded in the aircraft
maintenance records and include the following items: date, work performed, and name and certificate number of person returning aircraft to service.
However, S-LSA also get:
This aircraft may only be operated per the manufacturer’s aircraft
operating instructions (AOI), including any requirement for necessary
operating equipment specified in the aircraft’s equipment list. Night flight
and instrument flight rules (IFR) operations are authorized if allowed by
the AOI and if the instruments specified in § 91.205 are installed,
operational, and maintained per the applicable requirements of part 91.
(6)
 
Not Quite...

Here are the actual conditions on my E-LSA AW certificate. This is the same language as used for E-AB and S-LSA.

However, S-LSA also get:​


Paragraphs 22 & 23 that you quote are used in Op Lims for E-AB and E-LSA.

If these 2 paragraphs are found in Op Lims for S-LSA, they were issued in error.

Go to FAA Order 8130.2J Appendix D and you will find that these 2 paragraphs are issued to aircraft certificated under 21.191 and 21.191(b), (f), (g). (h), & (i) respectively.

S-LSA are certificated under 21.190.​
 
Paragraphs 22 & 23 that you quote are used in Op Lims for E-AB and E-LSA.

If these 2 paragraphs are found in Op Lims for S-LSA, they were issued in error.

Go to FAA Order 8130.2J Appendix D and you will find that these 2 paragraphs are issued to aircraft certificated under 21.191 and 21.191(b), (f), (g). (h), & (i) respectively.

I’ll admit it, I was wrong (that’s twice now). 8130.2J Appendix D is pretty clear.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression that a pilot with a Light Sport license and a "Driver's License medical" is legal to fly an E-LSA certificated airplane but not an E-AB, since an E-AB requires at least a Private Pilot license and 3rd Class Medical.

I'd think that this could be a reason to choose E-LSA over EAB registration.

Nope. As has been more or less mentioned, the airplane just has to fall within the limits of the “light sport” definition. The airplane can be S-LSA, E-LSA, E-AB, or type certificated like an Ercoupe, Cub, Champ, etc. it’s not what’s on the airworthiness certificate, it’s whether or not the plane meets the criteria for max gross weight, speed, stall speed, gear, prop, and so on.
 
Yes, Sport Pilots (i.e., driver's license only) can fly (some) E-AB!

The term "LSA" is, in part, a definition for purposes of identifying Sport Pilot privileges. The FAA states that exercising Sport Pilot privileges permits you to operate "Any light-sport aircraft for which you hold the endorsements required for its category and class." The FAA notes that when you get a sport pilot certificate, it "will not have any category and class ratings." The Sport Pilot limitations and privileges dictate what you can fly. One of the privs is to act as PIC of a "light-sport" aircraft.

Yes, there is a "LSA Category" (e.g., S-LSA) but Sport Pilots are not limited to flying LSA Category aircraft - as noted above, the SP certificate does not specify any category limitations (not even an "LSA category" limitation).

One simple fact helps to clarify:
- Certified/standard category planes can (and some do) meet the LSA definitions (e.g., ER Coupe). Is the ER Coupe a certified plane? Yes, but they are also at the same time an "LSA." Why . . . its AW certificate does not state it is an LSA - in fact it was built before the definition existed and they sure the heck did not comply with any LSA ASTM standard when built. Correct, but what is on the ER Coupe's AW certificate does not dictate whether it is an LSA - whether a plane is an LSA for purposes of Sport Pilot privileges is dictated by the FAA (not ASTM) definition.

This conveniently cross-applies to E-AB (yes regs sometimes are logical - shocking, right!).

- Similarly, some E-AB planes can and do meet the FAA's definition of LSA. Can a Sport Pilot act as PIC of an E-AB that meets the definition of an LSA - ya betcha if the Sport Pilot can fly it and be within what is allowed under the SP's privileges! What if you modify that E-AB so that it no longer meets the LSA definition? Then a Sport cannot act as PIC. Pretty simple.

Figuring out what planes you can fly as PIC with Sport Pilot privileges (i.e., driver's license/no 3rd class or basic med req) is a matter of applying the FAA's LSA definition (keeping in mind that the SP priv limitations include more than just the LSA definition that can impact what SP can fly). Whether a plane's AW certificate is standard/certified category or E-AB is 100% not relevant to determining whether a Sport Pilot can act as PIC. It really is that simple.
 
Just remember also that the airplane in question, whether EAB or Standard or any other category, must have ALWAYS met 100% of the criteria, since day 1. If (for example) your Champ had an STC that bumped its max gross weight to, say, 1350#, and you remove that STC and return it to a lower, LSA compliant gross weight, well, tough. Still not legal for a Sport Pilot to fly. Ever.

Aren’t FAA regulations fun?

But this has not much to do with an RV12. Those can be flown by anyone with a Sport Pilot or higher certificate, assuming you haven’t had a medical revoked.
 
Builder's choice. To qualify as ELSA the aircraft must be built exactly per plans and all parts must be purchased from the kit manufacturer.
Some people prefer to make minor or major modifications during the build. Or in some cases they may already have an engine or avionics and prefer to install these as opposed to ordering new from Vans. The builder my opt for EAB so that he/she doesn't have to go to class to obtain the repairman certificate. EAB can be modified to take it out of the Light-Sport parameters. ELSA cannot. There can be a multitude of reasons.
EAB is not necessarily better or worse than ELSA. Just different.

My question would be.... If I already have a 100hp Rotax 912-ULS (exact engine spec-d for this kit) and not buy one thru Vans... would that require me to go the E-AB route? In other words... does it have to meet spec or does it have to be purchased thru kit manufacturer?
Thanks for any information you can offer.

David
 
In other words... does it have to meet spec or does it have to be purchased thru kit manufacturer?
Thanks for any information you can offer.

The answer is yes to both questions.
Meeting the second requirement automatically assures it meets the first one.

Van's has to supply an ELSA builder with a form (Form 8130-15) certifying that the airplane kit was delivered able to be built as an exact copy of our SLSA aircraft. The able part is because it is then the builders responsibility to build it that way, and they have to sign the same form at certification certifying that they did so.
Van's is burdened with assuring that happens, and to help assure that, the FAA requires Van's to supply all components in order to sign the form certifying it as an ELSA kit.
 
The answer is yes to both questions.
Meeting the second requirement automatically assures it meets the first one.
Van's has to supply an ELSA builder with a form (Form 8130-15) certifying that the airplane kit was delivered able to be built as an exact copy of our SLSA aircraft. The able part is because it is then the builders responsibility to build it that way, and they have to sign the same form at certification certifying that they did so.
Van's is burdened with assuring that happens, and to help assure that, the FAA requires Van's to supply all components in order to sign the form certifying it as an ELSA kit.

As Scott says, Van's furnishes all components to build as an E-LSA. You must "show" the inspector that you built the aircraft exactly per the plans with no modifications. If there are any deviations from the plans, you must submit written documentation from the kit manufacturer approving such deviations.
 
Back
Top